U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
20140609
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Grant County, Central and Southern Parts, New Mexico
Fort Worth, Texas
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
nm662
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/8d6d4c2f-34ba-4bcb-ae49-b7f8f5a5d758/soil_nm662_2013.original.zip
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/8d6d4c2f-34ba-4bcb-ae49-b7f8f5a5d758/metadata/FGDC-STD-001-1998.xml
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/8d6d4c2f-34ba-4bcb-ae49-b7f8f5a5d758/metadata/FGDC-STD-001-1998.html
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/8d6d4c2f-34ba-4bcb-ae49-b7f8f5a5d758/metadata/ISO-19115:2003.xml
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/8d6d4c2f-34ba-4bcb-ae49-b7f8f5a5d758/metadata/ISO-19115:2003.html
This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most
detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National
Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing
maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base
and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely
sensed and other information.
This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and
computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area
extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory
of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable
pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at
the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line
features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features
too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large
enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and
management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the
National Soil Information System relational database, which gives
the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.
SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of
soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO
product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other
associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be
available from the primary organization listed in the Point of
Contact.
20030902
20131222
publication date
As needed
-109.048
-107.608
33.18
31.863
ISO 19115 Topic Categories
geoscientificInformation
None
soil survey
soils
Soil Survey Geographic
SSURGO
Spatial Reference System Identifiers
EPSG:4326
USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS)
New Mexico
Grant County
Allie Canyon Quadrangle
Antelope Ridge Quadrangle
Applegate Mountain Quadrangle
Bear Mountain Quadrangle
Brockman Quadrangle
Brushy Mountain Quadrangle
Buckhorn Quadrangle
Bullard Peak Quadrangle
Burro Peak Quadrangle
C Bar Ranch Quadrangle
Canteen Canyon Quadrangle
Canyon Hill Quadrangle
Caprock Mountain Quadrangle
Circle Mesa Quadrangle
Cliff Quadrangle
Cow Springs Mountain Quadrangle
Coyote Peak Quadrangle
Crookson Peak Quadrangle
Dorsey Ranch Quadrangle
Doyle Peak Quadrangle
Dwyer SE Quadrangle
Dwyer Quadrangle
Eagle Eye Peak Quadrangle
Faywood Station Quadrangle
Fort Bayard Quadrangle
Gage NW Quadrangle
Gage SW Quadrangle
Goat Camp Spring Quadrangle
Gold Hill Quadrangle
Grandmother Mountain West Quadrangle
Greg Hills Quadrangle
Hachita Peak Quadrangle
Hachita Quadrangle
Hat Top Mountain Quadrangle
Hendricks Peak Quadrangle
Hurley East Quadrangle
Hurley West Quadrangle
Lisbon Quadrangle
Mangas Springs Quadrangle
Maverick Mountain Quadrangle
Moon Ranch Quadrangle
Muir Ranch Quadrangle
Mule Creek Quadrangle
Nichols Canyon Quadrangle
Ninetysix Ranch Quadrangle
Ok Canyon Quadrangle
Playas Lake North Quadrangle
Playas Lake South Quadrangle
Playas Peak Quadrangle
Reading Mountain Quadrangle
Redrock Quadrangle
Rice Ranch Quadrangle
San Lorenzo Quadrangle
Santa Rita Mine Quadrangle
Separ NE Quadrangle
Separ Quadrangle
Silver City Quadrangle
Soldiers Farewell Hill Quadrangle
Steeple Rock Quadrangle
Taylor Mountain Quadrangle
The Saltys Quadrangle
Tillie Hall Peak Quadrangle
Twin Sisters Quadrangle
Tyrone Quadrangle
Victorio Ranch Quadrangle
Walker Canyon Quadrangle
Werney Hill Quadrangle
White Signal Quadrangle
Whitehorse Mountain Quadrangle
Whiterock Mountain Quadrangle
Whitewater Quadrangle
Willow Draw Quadrangle
Wilson Mountain Quadrangle
Wind Mountain Quadrangle
None
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products
derived from these data.
This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool
in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference
source. This is public information and may be interpreted by
organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on
needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate
application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to
reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any
authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps
for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.
Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater
than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation
of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The
depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from
them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and
detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data
and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only.
Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and
users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
State Soil Scientist
mailing address
6200 Jefferson, NE
Suite 305
Albuquerque
NM
87109
505-761-4433
505-761-4462
richard.strait@nm.usda.gov
The attribute accuracy is tested by manual
comparison of the source with hard copy plots and/or symbolized
display of the map data on an interactive computer graphic system.
Selected attributes that cannot be visually verified on plots or
on screen are interactively queried and verified on screen. In
addition, the attributes are tested against a master set of valid
attributes. All attribute data conform to the attribute codes in
the signed classification and correlation document and amendment(s).
Certain node/geometry and topology GT-polygon/chain relationships
are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements
(the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these
requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains
must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through
nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain
element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing
the limits of the file are free of gaps. The tests of logical
consistency are performed using vendor software. All internal
polygons are tested for closure with vendor software and are checked
on hard copy plots. All data are checked for common soil lines (i.e.,
adjacent polygons with the same label). Edge locations generally do
not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch.
The feature edges, descriptive attributes and feature labels of the
quadrangles in the Grant County, Central and Southern Parts, New Mexico
Soil Survey do not match with the quadrangles in the adjacent Luna County,
New Mexico Soil Survey, Gila-Duncan Area, Arizona, Parts of Graham and
Greenlee Counties Soil Survey, Hildago County, New Mexico Soil Survey, and
the Sierra County Area, New Mexico Soil Survey.
A map unit is a collection of areas defined and named in terms of
their soil components or miscellaneous areas or both. Each map
unit differs in some respect from all others in a survey area and
each map unit has a symbol that uniquely identifies the map unit
on a soil map. Each individual area, point, or line so identified
on the map is a delineation.
Soil Scientists identify small areas of soils or miscellaneous areas
that have properties and behavior significantly different than the
named soils in the surrounding map unit. These minor components
may be indicated as special features. If they have a minimal effect
on use and management, or could not be precisely located, they may
not be indicated on the map.
A map unit has specified kinds of soils or miscellaneous areas
(map unit components), each with a designated range in
proportionate extent. Map units include one or more kinds of soil
or miscellaneous area. Miscellaneous areas are areas that have little
or no recognizable soil.
Specific National Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures
were used in the classification of soils, design and name of map
units, and location of special soil features. These standards are
outlined in Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993,
USDA, NRCS; Agricultural Handbook 436, Soil Taxonomy, 1995,
USDA, NRCS; and all Amendments; Keys to Soil Taxonomy,
(current issue) USDA, NRCS; National Soil Survey
Handbook, title 430-VI,(current issue) USDA, NRCS.
The actual composition and interpretive purity of the map unit
delineations were based on data collected by scientists during
the course of preparing the soil maps. Adherence to National
Cooperative Soil Survey standards and procedures is based on
peer review, quality control, and quality assurance. Quality
control is outlined in the memorandum of understanding for the
soil survey area and in documents that reside with the Natural
Resources Conservation Service state soil scientist. Four kinds
of map units are used in soil surveys: consociations, complexes,
associations, and undifferentiated groups.
Consociations - Consociations are named for the dominant soil.
In a consociation, delineated areas use a single name from the
dominant component in the map unit. Dissimilar components are
minor in extent. The soil component in a consociation may be
identified at any taxonomic level. Soil series is the lowest
taxonomic level. A consociation that is named as a miscellaneous
area is dominantly that kind of area and minor components do not
significantly affect the use of the map unit. The total amount of
dissimilar inclusions of other components in a map unit generally
does not exceed about 15 percent if limiting and 25 percent if
nonlimiting. A single component of a dissimilar limiting inclusion
generally does not exceed 10 percent if very contrasting.
Complexes and associations - Complexes and associations consist
of two or more dissimilar components that occur in a regularly
repeating pattern. The total amount of other dissimilar components
is minor extent. The following arbitrary rule determines whether
complex or association is used in the name. The major components
of an association can be separated at the scale of mapping. In
either case, because the major components are sufficiently different
in morphology or behavior, the map unit cannot be called a
consociation. In each delineation of a complex or an association,
each major component is normally present though their proportions
may vary appreciably from one delineation to another. The total
amount of inclusions in a map unit that are dissimilar to any of
the major components does not exceed 15 percent if limiting and
25 percent if nonlimiting. A single kind of dissimilar limiting
inclusion usually does not exceed 10 percent.
Undifferentiated groups - Undifferentiated groups consist of two
or more components that are not consistently associated
geographically and, therefore, do not always occur together in
the same map delineation. These components are included in the
same named map unit because their use and management are the same
or very similar for common uses. Generally they are grouped together
because some common feature, such as steepness, stoniness, or
flooding, determines their use and management. If two or more
additional map units would serve no useful purpose, they may be
included in the same unit. Each delineation has at least one of the
major components, and some may have all of them. The same principles
regarding the proportion of minor components that apply to
consociations also apply to undifferentiated groups. The same
principles regarding proportion of inclusion apply to
undifferentiated groups as to consociations.
Minimum documentation consists of three complete soil profile
descriptions that are collected for each soil added to the legend,
one additional per 3,000 acres mapped; three 10 observation
transects for each map unit, one additional 10 point transect per
3,000 acres.
A defined standard or level of confidence in the interpretive
purity of the map unit delineations is attained by adjusting the
kind and intensity of field investigations. Field investigations
and data collection are carried out in sufficient detail to name
map units and to identify accurately and consistently areas of
about 6 acres.
The accuracy of these digital data is based upon their
compilation to base maps that meet National Map
Accuracy Standards at a scale of 1 inch equals 1,000
feet. The difference in positional accuracy between the
soil boundaries and special soil features locations in the
field and their digitized map locations is unknown. The
locational accuracy of soil delineations on the ground varies
with the transition between map units.
For example, on long gently sloping landscapes the transition
occurs gradually over many feet. Where landscapes change
abruptly from steep to level, the transition will be very
narrow. Soil delineation boundaries and special soil features
generally were digitized within 0.01 inch of their locations on
the digitizing source. The digital map elements are edge matched
between data sets. The data along each quadrangle edge are
matched against the data for the adjacent quadrangle. Edge
locations generally do not deviate from centerline to centerline
by more than 0.01 inch.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
1983
Soil Survey of Grant County, New Mexico, Central and Southern
Parts
atlas
Washington, D.C.
U.S. Government Printing Office
24000
paper
2001
publication date
SCS1
source of soil map unit delineations and
soil symbols at 1:24000 and 48000
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Unpublished material
publication annotation overlays
map
24000
stable-base material
1997
1997
NRCS1
final publication negatives used to develop
soil survey film positives
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Unpublished material
publication annotation overlays
map
48000
stable-base material
1997
1997
NRCS2
final publication negatives used to develop
ratioed soil survey film positives
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Unpublished material
ratioed soil survey film positives of publication annotation
overlays
remote sensing image
24000
stable-base material
2003
2003
NRCS3
source of soil map unit delineations, soil
symbols, and special soil features
U.S. Geological Survey
1998
multiple 7.5 minute orthophotographs and composites 1996 - 1998
remote sensing image
Menlo Park, California
U.S. Geological Survey
24000
stable-base material
2001
publication date
USGS1
compilation base
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Unpublished material
annotated overlay
map
24000
stable-base material
1998
1998
NRCS4
source material for scanning
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
2003
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Grant County, New
Mexico, Central and Southern Parts
map
Fort Worth, Texas
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service, National Cartography and
Geospatial Center
online
2004
2004
NRCS5
SSURGO data used in reevaluation of data
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
2004
National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
unknown
Fort Collins, Colorado
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
database
2004
2004
publication date
NASIS
attribute (tabular) information
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Unpublished material
Region 8 soils geodatabase
file geodatabase
vector digital data
2006
2012
SSURGO publication date
NRCS6
Source of digital revision
The Grant County, New Mexico, Central and Southern Parts Soil Survey was published in 1983 at 1:24,000 and 1:48,000 scale. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the final correlation in 1979. An evaluation was made of the soil survey in 2001. It was determined that the soil map unit delineations were accurate. One additional map unit was added to the soil survey. This change was made to reflect present day soil survey concepts, soil classification, and soil interpretations. Amendments to the correlation document reflecting this change is on file at the NRCS New Mexico State Office. The additional map unit is as follows:
W-----WATER
SCS1
2003
The final publication negatives were used to develop
ratioed soil survey film positives. Soil map unit and special soil
features delineations were manually recompiled from the soil survey
film positives (scale: 24,000) to 4 mil. annotated stable-base overlays
that were registered to multiple 7.5 minute orthophotographs.
SCS1
USGS1
NRCS1
NRCS2
NRCS3
2001
During the map compilation quality review an
evaluation was made of the map unit joins for surrounding soil
surveys by a soil data quality specialist.
USGS1
NRCS1
2001
The annotated overlays were raster scanned on
a SCANGRAPHICS CF 500 Scanner at a resolution of 300 dpi. The soil
area features and special soil features were processed in LT4X
Version 4.11. The soil processing consisted of raster editing, map
neatline development, labeling, edge matching and vector conversion.
The soil area features and special soil features were written to
Digital Line Graph Optional format in LT4X. Digitizing and quality
control were done by the geographic information system specialist
and cartographic technicians at the Temple, Texas Digitizing and
Certification Center.
NRCS4
2003
The soil area features and special soil features
DLGs were imported into ARC/INFO 7.2.1. The 7.5 minute quadrangles
for each coverage were merged together into a soil survey area and
additional editing was performed. The coverages were edge matched
to existing SSURGO data. New DLGs reflecting these changes were
written with ARC/INFO 7.2.1.
NRCS4
2003
The soil survey area coverage was evaluated with
with the October 1998 ARC/INFO SSURGO Evaluation AMLs provided by
the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth,
Texas. Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the
soil survey area coverage was processed with the October 1998
archiving AMLs provided by the National Cartography and Geospatial
Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
NRCS4
2003
The spatial data has been revised along the county
boundary. The soil survey area coverage was evaluated with
the December 2003 ARC/INFO SSURGO Evaluation AMLs provided by
the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Fort Worth,
Texas. Upon successful completion of the SSURGO Evaluation, the
soil survey area coverage was processed with the December 2003
archiving AMLs provided by the National Cartography and Geospatial
Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
NRCS5
2004
The National Soil Information System database was
developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service soil scientists
according to national standards.
SCS1
2004
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20040331
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
NASIS
20040413
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20040426
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
NASIS
20040430
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20040608
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
NASIS
20040608
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20040701
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
NASIS
20040701
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20050119
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
NASIS
20050124
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20060202
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change. In this version of the NASIS attribute data, soil properties related to the hydric soil rating and landscape position were updated and new tabular data and interpretations generated.
NASIS
20060210
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20060301
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
NASIS
20060307
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20060629
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
NASIS
20060719
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20061130
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
NASIS
20061222
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20081030
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
This update of the tabular data correlates Ecological Site ID numbers to the ESIS name and numbering system, and includes additional soil interpretations for grazing land uses.
NASIS
20081107
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20081113
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
In this update of the tabular data, additional interpretative tables were generated and uploaded for several uses.
NASIS
20081209
The spatial data for the Soil Survey of Grant County, Central and
Southern Parts, New Mexico was downloaded from the Soil Data Mart on
October 15, 2012. The individual shapefiles were appended into a
geodatabase for Region 8. The data were processed in ARCGIS 10.1
using a topology object with a 0.1 meter cluster tolerance
for the purpose of eliminating gaps and overlaps within the Region 8
soils geodatabase. Individual soil survey area data were exported as
shapefiles from the regional geodatabase. A datum transformation
from NAD83 to WGS84 using the NAD_1983_To_WGS_1984_1 datum
transformation method was applied to the data. The data were checked
with the SSURGO Evaluation scripts provided by U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. The shapefiles
were then uploaded to the soil data warehouse for archival and
distribution.
NRCS6
20130801
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
NASIS
20131222
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
NASIS
20131222
New Mexico
Special Soil Features
Special Soil Features represent soil, miscellaneous area, or landform
features that are too small to be digitized as soil delineations
(area features).
Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.
Special Soil Features Codes
Special Soil Features labels represent specific Special Soil
Features. These features are identified with a descriptive
label. The label is assigned to the point or line assigned
to represent the feature on maps.
Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS;
National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647
(current issue), USDA, NRCS.
Classification and Correlation of the Soils of Grant County, New
Mexico, Central and Southern Parts
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Map Unit Delineations are closed polygons that may be dominated
by a single soil or miscellaneous area component plus allowable
similar or dissimilar soils, or they can be geographic mixtures
of groups of soils or soils and miscellaneous areas.
The map unit symbol uniquely identifies each closed map unit
delineation. Each symbol corresponds to a map unit name. The
map unit key is used to link to information in the National
Soil Information System tables.
Map Unit Delineations are described by the National Soil
Information System database. This attribute database gives the
proportionate extent of the component soils and the properties for
each soil. The database contains both estimated and measured data
on the physical and chemical soil properties and soil
interpretations for engineering, water management, recreation,
agronomic, woodland, range, and wildlife uses of the soil.
The National Soil Information System database contains static
metadata. It documents the data structure and includes such
information as what tables, columns, indexes, and relationships
are defined as well as a variety of attributes of each of these
database objects. Attributes include table and column
descriptions and detailed domain information.
The National Soil Information System database also contains a
distribution metadata. It records the criteria used for selecting
map units and components for inclusion in the set of distributed
data.
Special features are described in the feature table. It includes an
area symbol, feature label, feature name, and feature description for
each special and ad hoc feature in the survey area.
Soil Taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and
interpreting soil surveys. Agricultural Handbook 436, 1999, USDA, SCS.
Keys to Soil Taxonomy (current issue), USDA, SCS.
National Soil Survey Handbook, Title 430-VI, part 647 (current
issue), USDA, NRCS.
Agricultural Handbook 18, Soil Survey Manual, 1993, USDA, SCS.
Earth Data Analysis Center
Clearinghouse Manager
mailing and physical address
MSC01 1110
1 University of New Mexico
Albuquerque
NM
87131-0001
USA
505-277-3622 ext. 230
505-277-3614
clearinghouse@edac.unm.edu
0800 - 1700 MT, M-F -7 hours GMT
Downloadable Data
The material on this site is made available as a public service. Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only and the Earth Data Analysis Center (EDAC), Resource Geographic Information System (RGIS) and The University of New Mexico are not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. No responsibility is assumed for damages or other liabilities due to the accuracy, availability, use or misuse of the information herein provided. Unless otherwise indicated in the documentation (metadata) for individual data sets, information on this site is public domain and may be copied without permission; citation of the source is appreciated.
ZIP
10
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/8d6d4c2f-34ba-4bcb-ae49-b7f8f5a5d758/soil_nm662_2013.original.zip
Download from Resource Geographic Information System (RGIS) at http://rgis.unm.edu.
None. The files are available to download from Resource Geographic Information System (RGIS) (http://rgis.unm.edu).
Contact Earth Data Analysis Center at clearinghouse@edac.unm.edu
Contact Earth Data Analysis Center at clearinghouse@edac.unm.edu
Adequate computer capability is the only technical prerequisite for viewing data in digital form.
20240329
Earth Data Analysis Center
Clearinghouse Manager
mailing and physical address
MSC01 1110
1 University of New Mexico
Albuquerque
NM
87131-0001
USA
505-277-3622 ext. 230
505-277-3614
clearinghouse@edac.unm.edu
0800 - 1700 MT, M-F -7 hours GMT
FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
FGDC-STD-001-1998
local time