RGISARCHIVE::75c8b148-4f10-450a-aa2c-40cef9e948d9::ISO-19115:2003
eng; USA
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
State Soil Scientist
602-280-8837
602-280-8805
230 N. First Ave Suite 509
Phoenix
AZ
85003
cathy.mcguire@az.usda.gov
pointOfContact
2024-03-29
ISO 19115 Geographic Information - Metadata
ISO 19115
New Mexico
World Geodetic System 1984
revision
http://gstore.unm.edu
resourceProvider
Unknown
World Geodetic System 1984
revision
http://www.epsg-registry.org/export.htm?gml=urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326
resourceProvider
4326
Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database for Fort Defiance Area, Parts of Apache and Navajo Counties, Arizona, and McKinley and San Juan Counties, New Mexico
2014-06-09T16:00:11
publication
Downloadable Data
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
originator
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Fort Worth
Texas
publisher
This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most
detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National
Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing
maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base
and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely
sensed and other information.
This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and
computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area
extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory
of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable
pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at
the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line
features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features
too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large
enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and
management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the
National Soil Information System relational database, which gives
the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.
SSURGO depicts information about the kinds and distribution of
soils on the landscape. The soil map and data used in the SSURGO
product were prepared by soil scientists as part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
State Soil Scientist
602-280-8837
602-280-8805
230 N. First Ave Suite 509
Phoenix
AZ
85003
cathy.mcguire@az.usda.gov
soil survey
soils
Soil Survey Geographic
SSURGO
None
Arizona
New Mexico
Apache County
Navajo County
McKinley County
San Juan County
Antelope Lake Quadrangle
Arrowhead Butte NE Quadrangle
Arrowhead Butte Quadrangle
Beautiful Valley Well Quadrangle
Beeshsikad Spring Quadrangle
Betty Well Quadrangle
Big Rock Hill Quadrangle
Big Willow Spring Canyon Quadrangle
Bird Springs Wash Quadrangle
Boggy Lake Well Quadrangle
Buell Park Quadrangle
Burntwater Wash Quadrangle
Chafin Well Quadrangle
Chambers Quadrangle
Chimney Butte Quadrangle
Chinde Mesa Quadrangle
Chuska Lake Quadrangle
Chuska Peak Quadrangle
Cornfields Quadrangle
Coyote Canyon NW Quadrangle
Coyote Canyon Quadrangle
Crevasse Canyon Quadrangle
Crystal Quadrangle
Dilkon Quadrangle
Dipping Water Well Quadrangle
Ear Rock Quadrangle
East of Kinlichee Quadrangle
Echo Canyon Quadrangle
Egloffstein Butte Quadrangle
Elephant Butte Quadrangle
First Flat Mesa Quadrangle
Five Buttes Quadrangle
Fort Defiance Quadrangle
French Butte Quadrangle
Ganado Mesa SW Quadrangle
Ganado Mesa Quadrangle
Ganado Quadrangle
Greasewood Spring Quadrangle
Greasewood Quadrangle
Great Bend Quadrangle
Grey Hill Spring Quadrangle
Hard Ground Flats Quadrangle
Hauke Mesa Quadrangle
Houck Quadrangle
Hunters Point Quadrangle
Indian Wells Quadrangle
Jadito Spring Quadrangle
Joe Woody Well Quadrangle
Keams Canyon Quadrangle
Kinlichee Quadrangle
Klagetoh North Quadrangle
Klagetoh South Quadrangle
Lamb Well Quadrangle
Low Mountain Quadrangle
Lower Wheatfields Quadrangle
Lupton Quadrangle
Mitten Peak Quadrangle
Montezumas Chair NW Quadrangle
Montezumas Chair Quadrangle
Na Ah Tee Canyon Quadrangle
Naschitti Quadrangle
North Mill Well Quadrangle
Oak Creek Mountain Quadrangle
Oak Spring Quadrangle
Pilot Rock Quadrangle
Pine Springs Quadrangle
Piney Hill Quadrangle
Red Clay Wash Quadrangle
Red Lake Well Quadrangle
Rotten Bananas Butte Quadrangle
Sanders Quadrangle
Satan Butte Quadrangle
Sawmill Quadrangle
Sheep Springs Quadrangle
Shonto Butte Quadrangle
Sonsela Buttes Quadrangle
Spider Rock Quadrangle
Standing Horse Mesa Quadrangle
Standing Rock NW Quadrangle
Steamboat Canyon Quadrangle
Steamboat Rock NE Quadrangle
Steamboat Rock Quadrangle
Sunflower Butte Quadrangle
Sunrise Springs Quadrangle
Surrender Canyon Quadrangle
Tanner Springs Quadrangle
The Pillar 2 SW Quadrangle
The Pillar 3 NW Quadrangle
The Pillar 3 SE Quadrangle
Toadimdaaska Mesa Quadrangle
Toadlena Quadrangle
Todilto Park Quadrangle
Tohatchi Quadrangle
Tolani Quadrangle
Tolapai Spring Quadrangle
Tovar Mesa East Quadrangle
Toyee Quadrangle
Toyei School Quadrangle
Tse Bonita School Quadrangle
Tsin Naan Tee Quadrangle
Tudecoz Spring Quadrangle
Turkey Track Butte Quadrangle
Twin Lakes Quadrangle
Upper Wheatfields Quadrangle
Uranium Spring Quadrangle
Washington Pass Quadrangle
West of Window Rock Quadrangle
Whippoorwill Spring Quadrangle
White Clay Quadrangle
White Cone Quadrangle
White Rock Wash Quadrangle
Wide Ruins SW Quadrangle
Wide Ruins Quadrangle
Window Rock Quadrangle
Winslow NE Quadrangle
USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS)
Access Constraints: None. Use Constraints:
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, should be acknowledged as the data source in products
derived from these data.
This data set is not designed for use as a primary regulatory tool
in permitting or citing decisions, but may be used as a reference
source. This is public information and may be interpreted by
organizations, agencies, units of government, or others based on
needs; however, they are responsible for the appropriate
application. Federal, State, or local regulatory bodies are not to
reassign to the Natural Resources Conservation Service any
authority for the decisions that they make. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service will not perform any evaluations of these maps
for purposes related solely to State or local regulatory programs.
Photographic or digital enlargement of these maps to scales greater
than at which they were originally mapped can cause misinterpretation
of the data. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The
depicted soil boundaries, interpretations, and analysis derived from
them do not eliminate the need for onsite sampling, testing, and
detailed study of specific sites for intensive uses. Thus, these data
and their interpretations are intended for planning purposes only.
Digital data files are periodically updated. Files are dated, and
users are responsible for obtaining the latest version of the data.
eng; USA
geoscientificInformation
-110.67
-108.346
35.167
36.207
publication date
2008-01-28
2013-12-14
Digital versions of hydrography, cultural features, and other
associated layers that are not part of the SSURGO data set may be
available from the primary organization listed in the Point of
Contact.
Earth Data Analysis Center
Clearinghouse Manager
505-277-3622 ext. 230
505-277-3614
MSC01 1110
1 University of New Mexico
Albuquerque
NM
87131-0001
USA
clearinghouse@edac.unm.edu
0800 - 1700 MT, M-F -7 hours GMT
distributor
None. The files are available to download from Resource Geographic Information System (RGIS) (http://rgis.unm.edu).
Contact Earth Data Analysis Center at clearinghouse@edac.unm.edu
ZIP
28
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/75c8b148-4f10-450a-aa2c-40cef9e948d9/soil_az715_2013.original.zip
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/75c8b148-4f10-450a-aa2c-40cef9e948d9/soil_az715_2013.original.zip
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/75c8b148-4f10-450a-aa2c-40cef9e948d9/metadata/FGDC-STD-001-1998.xml
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/75c8b148-4f10-450a-aa2c-40cef9e948d9/metadata/FGDC-STD-001-1998.html
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/75c8b148-4f10-450a-aa2c-40cef9e948d9/metadata/ISO-19115:2003.xml
https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgisarchive/datasets/75c8b148-4f10-450a-aa2c-40cef9e948d9/metadata/ISO-19115:2003.html
Certain node/geometry and topology GT-polygon/chain relationships
are collected or generated to satisfy topological requirements
(the GT-polygon corresponds to the soil delineation). Some of these
requirements include: chains must begin and end at nodes, chains
must connect to each other at nodes, chains do not extend through
nodes, left and right GT-polygons are defined for each chain
element and are consistent throughout, and the chains representing
the limits of the file are free of gaps. The tests of logical
consistency are performed using vendor software. All internal
polygons are tested for closure with vendor software and are checked
on hard copy plots. All data are checked for common soil lines (i.e.,
adjacent polygons with the same label). Edge locations generally do
not deviate from centerline to centerline by more than 0.01 inch.
The feature edges and descriptive attributes and feature labels in
the Fort Defiance Area, Parts of Apache and Navajo Counties, Arizona,
and McKinley and San Juan Counties, New Mexico Soil Survey do not match
with the quadrangles in the adjacent Shiprock Area, Parts of San Juan
County, New Mexico, and Apache County, Arizona Soil Survey the McKinley
County Area, New Mexico, McKinley County and Parts of Cibola and San Juan
Counties Soil Survey, the Navajo County Area, Arizona, Central Part Soil
Survey, the Apache County Area, Arizona, Central Part Soil Survey, and
the Hopi Area, Arizona, Parts of Coconino and Navajo Counties Soil Survey
due to age or conditions noted in the correlation document, published
report, or other archived documentation. The soil survey boundary is
considered to be the soil boundary for the Shiprock Area, Parts of San
Juan County, New Mexico, and Apache County, Arizona Soil Survey, the
McKinley County Area, New Mexico, McKinley County and Parts of Cibola
and San Juan Counties Soil Survey, the Navajo County Area, Arizona,
Central Part Soil Survey, the Apache County, Arizona Central Part Soil
Survey, and the Hopi Area, Arizona, Parts of Coconino and Navajo Counties
Soil Survey.
Field procedures for the soil survey included
plotting of soil boundaries determined by field observation and
interpretation of remotely sensed data. Boundaries were verified at
closely spaced intervals, and the soils in each delineation were
identified by traversing and transecting the landscape. Bureau of
Indian Affairs soil scientists described and sampled the soils,
analyzed samples in the laboratory and statistically analyzed the
data. The classification and map unit names were finalized at the
final correlation in December, 2007.
2007-01-01T00:00:00
ASCS1
The soil survey field sheets were raster scanned
at a resolution of 600 dpi by Pixxures Incorporated. Pixxures ortho-
rectified the raster scans, mosaiced the field sheet images into one
tagged image file (TIF) format and converted the image to a run-length
coded (RLC) format. The RLC files were converted to ArcInfo vector
polygon layers by the NRCS Temple Texas Digitizing and Certification
Center. Preliminary line editing and quality control were done
by the geographic information system specialist and cartographic
technicians at the Temple Texas Digitizing and Certification Center.
The digitizing center clipped the vector file into four quadrants for
ease of management and sent the files (via the NRCS Arizona State
Office)to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Gallup, New Mexico office for
further evaluation and editing.
2007-01-01T00:00:00
ASCS1
BIA1
NRCS1
NRCS3
The Bureau of Indian Affairs, Gallup, New Mexico soil
scientists converted the preliminary layers to ArcView shape files and
edited the soil polygon data using ArcView version 3.2. A mosaiced
digital orthophoto image was used as a control base for the on-screen
editing. The finished shape files were sent to the NRCS Arizona state
office, mosaiced into one seamless file, and converted to an ArcGIS
geodatabase and reviewed for topological control using ArcGIS version
9.2. Upon completion, the geodatabase was converted to an ArcInfo
interchange file and sent to the Temple Texas Digitizing and
Certification Center.
2008-01-01T00:00:00
NRCS2
NRCS3
NRCS4
NRCS5
NRCS6
The National Soil Information System database was
developed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs soil scientists according to
national standards.
2008-01-01T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State
Soil Scientist of Arizona or delegate, upon completion of data quality
verification, determined that the tabular data should be released for
official use. A selected set of map units and components in the soil
survey legend were copied to a staging database, and rating values for
selected interpretations were generated. The list of selected
interpretations is stored in the database table named sainterp.
2008-01-01T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State
Soil Scientist or delegate verified that the labels on the digitized
soil map units link to map units in the tabular database, and certified
the joined data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system
assigned version number and date stamp were added and the data were
copied to the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and
components were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into
the soil data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart.
The spatial data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
2008-01-01T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
2008-01-23T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
2008-01-28T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
2008-01-28T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
2008-01-28T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
2008-09-08T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
2008-09-09T00:00:00
NASIS
The tabular data were extracted from the data
mart without change. The spatial data's coordinate system was transformed
to UTM Zone 12, Northern Hemisphere (NAD 83) using ESRI ArcObjects 8.3
"ConvertFeatureClass" and exported to an ESRI shapefile.
2009-06-05T00:00:00
NASIS
The survey-wide ArcGIS geodatabase from the online SSURGO data were
imported to ARC/INFO 9.2 by certification staff at the Montana
Digitizing Unit. Topology errors on the boundary, that were
flagged in preparation for the National Soils Geospatial Database,
were corrected as directed in the National Bulletin: 430-9-5.
Evaluation macros of June 2004 were applied to the
data. Map unit labels were compared to an approved map unit legend
from the National Soil Information System data base. ARCGIS was
used to join to adjacent survey boundaries and verify previous
adjacent survey joins. The data were uploaded to the soil data
warehouse staging server.
2009-06-08T00:00:00
NRCS7
NRCS8
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
2009-10-06T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, generated new rating values for selected interpretations
using current interpretation rules from the NASIS database.
2009-10-06T00:00:00
NASIS
The tabular data were extracted from the data mart without change.
The spatial data's coordinate system was transformed to UTM Zone 12, Northern Hemisphere (NAD 83)
using ESRI ArcObjects 8.3 "ConvertFeatureClass" and exported to an ESRI shapefile.
2010-09-09T00:00:00
NASIS
The previous version of this SSURGO database was edited to bring
correct alignment to the official boundary. Soil Survey for Canyon de Chelly National
Monument AZ712 was used to adjust the boundary of AZ715 to its proper alignment in the
area of Canyon de Chelly National Monument.
2010-12-06T00:00:00
NRCS9
The tabular data were extracted from the data mart
without change. The spatial data's coordinate system was transformed
to UTM Zone 12, Northern Hemisphere (NAD 83) using ESRI ArcObjects 8.3
"ConvertFeatureClass" and exported to an ESRI shapefile.
2010-12-07T00:00:00
NASIS
The survey-wide ArcGIS geodatabase from the online SSURGO data were
imported to ARC/INFO 9.2 by certification staff at the Montana
Digitizing Unit. Evaluation macros of July 2009 were applied to the
data. Map unit labels were compared to an approved map unit legend
from the National Soil Information System data base. ARCGIS was
used to join to adjacent survey boundaries and verify previous
adjacent survey joins. The data were uploaded to the soil data
warehouse staging server.
2010-12-08T00:00:00
NRCS10
NRCS11
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
2011-04-27T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
2011-04-27T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
2011-04-27T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
2011-04-27T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
2011-04-27T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
2011-04-27T00:00:00
NASIS
The spatial data for the Soil Survey of Fort Defiance Area,
Parts of Apache and Navajo Counties, Arizona, and Mckinley and
San Juan Counties, New Mexico was downloaded from the Soil Data Mart
on October 15, 2012. The individual shapefiles were appended into a
geodatabase for Region 8. The data were processed in ARCGIS 10.1
using a topology object with a 0.1 meter cluster tolerance
for the purpose of eliminating gaps and overlaps within the Region 8
soils geodatabase. Individual soil survey area data were exported as
shapefiles from the regional geodatabase. A datum transformation
from NAD83 to WGS84 using the NAD_1983_To_WGS_1984_1 datum
transformation method was applied to the data. The data were checked
with the SSURGO Evaluation scripts provided by U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. The shapefiles
were then uploaded to the soil data warehouse for archival and
distribution.
2013-07-31T00:00:00
NRCS12
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate, upon completion of data quality verification, determined
that the tabular data should be released for official use. A
selected set of map units and components in the soil survey legend was
copied to a staging database, and rating values for selected
interpretations were generated. The list of selected interpretations is
stored in the database table named sainterp.
2013-12-14T00:00:00
NASIS
The Natural Resources Conservation Service State Soil Scientist or
delegate verified that the labels on the digitized soil map units
link to map units in the tabular database, and certified the joined
data sets for release to the Soil Data Warehouse. A system assigned
version number and date stamp were added and the data were copied to
the data warehouse. The tabular data for the map units and components
were extracted from the data warehouse and reformatted into the soil
data delivery data model, then stored in the Soil Data Mart. The spatial
data were copied to the Soil Data Mart without change.
2013-12-14T00:00:00
NASIS
base materials for field mapping and hydrographic
layer
24000
multiple photographs
ASCS1
1980-01-01T00:00:00
U.S. Department of Agriculture
publication date
2001-01-01
source of soil map unit delineations, soil symbols
24000
Ortho-rectified field sheets
BIA1
PIXXURES Incorporated
2004
2004-01-01
source of soil map unit delineations and soil
symbols
24000
electronic map compilation (RLC) raster images
NRCS1
PIXXURES Incorporated
2004
2004-01-01
compilation base
24000
multiple digital orthophotographic quadrangles (DOQ)
NRCS2
1998-01-01T00:00:00
U.S. Geological Survey
publication date
2004-01-01
digital soil survey area
24000
Arc/INFO coverage
NRCS3
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
2004
2004-01-01
digital soil survey area
24000
ArcView shape file
NRCS4
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
2005
2005-01-01
digital soil survey area
24000
ArcGIS geodatabase file
NRCS5
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
2007
2007-01-01
digital soil survey area
24000
Arc/INFO Interchange File
NRCS6
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
2008
2008-01-01
soils attribute (tabular) information
National Soil Information System (NASIS) data base
NASIS
2007-01-01T00:00:00
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs
publication date
2008-01-01
digital information containing area and special
soil features for evaluation
24000
ArcGIS geodatabase files for the soil survey of
Fort Defiance Area, Parts of Apache and Navajo Counties,
Arizona, and McKinley and San Juan Counties, New Mexico
NRCS7
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
2009
2009-01-01
map unit legend used for comparison to spatial
map unit labels
National Soil Information System (NASIS) database for
Fort Defiance Area, Parts of Apache and Navajo Counties,
Arizona, and McKinley and San Juan Counties, New Mexico
NRCS8
2009-01-01T00:00:00
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
export certification date
2009-01-01
Updated boundary alignment.
24000
Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO) Soil
Survey for the Canyon de Chelly National Monument,
Arizona
NRCS9
2010-01-01T00:00:00
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
publication date
2010-01-01
digital information containing area and special
soil features for evaluation
24000
ArcGIS geodatabase files for the soil survey of
Fort Defiance Area, Parts of Apache and Navajo Counties,
Arizona, and McKinley and San Juan Counties, New Mexico
NRCS10
U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service
2010
2010-12-08
map unit legend used for comparison to spatial map unit labels
National Soil Information System (NASIS) database for
Fort Defiance Area, Parts of Apache and Navajo Counties,
Arizona, and McKinley and San Juan Counties, New Mexico
NRCS11
2010-01-01T00:00:00
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
export certification date
2010-12-08
Source of digital revision
Region 8 soils geodatabase
NRCS12
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources
Conservation Service
SSURGO publication date
2006-01-01
2012-01-01
Earth Data Analysis Center
Clearinghouse Manager
505-277-3622 ext. 230
505-277-3614
MSC01 1110
1 University of New Mexico
Albuquerque
NM
87131-0001
USA
clearinghouse@edac.unm.edu
0800 - 1700 MT, M-F -7 hours GMT
custodian